Application de ce terme à Vatican II par John DALY 2018-04-16 18:13:59 |
Imprimer |
Cher AVV-VVK,
Autant que je sache le premier à appliquer à Vatican II la métaphore de saint Léon fut le regretté Patrick Henry Omlor. Cet écrivain a sauvé littéralement des centaines de prêtres de la catastrophe d'adopter le NOM et il mérite bien sa place dans l'histoire de la crise que nous vivons.
Cela a dû être vers le début des années 70 qu'il écrivait :
Is It The Same Church?
The French have a paradoxical saying: "The more it changes, the more it stays the same." This, of course, is not true in most real-life situations. An ashtray full of cigar ashes is not a cigar. And a church that has been demolished to rubble or converted into a dining hall is no longer a church. Let no one delude himself any longer. That ecumenical organisation out there with its lying propaganda organs all over the world, called euphemistically the "diocesan press" or "the Catholic press", or the "Vatican Guidelines" for this and that; that new Church with its cardinals and bishops dedicated to "interfaith," and with its faithless priests who think of themselves as nothing more than "presiders of the assembly" or "ministers of the word," and with its craven and bamboozled "People of God" robbed of their birthright. -- all that is simply not the true Catholic Church. No, that ecumenical nightmare, mired in chaos, is Satan's own Ark of Perdition. Just as Pope St. Leo I rightfully referred to a certain bogus "ecumenical council" as the Robber Council (Latrocinium), so likewise what now confronts us is nothing more nor less than a Robber Church.
Soutenir le Forum Catholique dans son entretien, c'est possible. Soit à l'aide d'un virement mensuel soit par le biais d'un soutien ponctuel. Rendez-vous sur la page dédiée en cliquant ici. D'avance, merci !
|
3 liseurs actuellement sur le forum |