La boutique de l’Espérance, partenaire historique du Forum catholique !
[ Me connecter ]
Messages récents | Retour à la liste des messages | Rechercher
Afficher la discussion

Confusion au sommet
par Paterculus 2020-02-14 08:12:16
Imprimer Imprimer

Trouvé sur Life Site News

(Mes réflexions en français à la fin.)

ROME, February 13, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Questions regarding the magisterial weight of the Amazon Synod’s final document, which called for married priests and “new” ministries for women in the region, took center stage at the February 12 Vatican press conference on Pope Francis’s summary document on the synod, Querida Amazonia [Beloved Amazon].

The synod’s final document, which received a two-thirds majority from bishops at the conclusion of the October 6-27 Vatican assembly, proposed ordaining married men to the priesthood in order to make the Eucharist more widely available to Catholics in the Amazon region (n. 111).

At the presser, a chorus of often discordant voices united in expressing their common confusion over Pope Francis’s introduction to Querida Amazonia, in which he states his intention to “officially present the [synod’s] final document,” encourage “everyone to read it,” and “strive to apply it” according to their vocation in the Church.

Was the Pope officially approving the synod’s final document and its proposal for married priests, even though he was silent about celibacy and “viri probati” [i.e. men of proven virtue proposed for ordination] in his apostolic exhortation? And if so, was he giving bishops’ conferences — particular that in Germany — the go ahead to decide on married priests at the local level?

In prepared remarks, panelist Cardinal Michael Czerny, who served as special secretary for the Amazon Synod, discussed the “status of the two documents” and where they “fit into the magisterium.”

Regarding the final document, he said that “apart from formal magisterial authority,” the Pope’s “official presentation and encouragement” confer on it “a certain moral authority.”

SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
Email address
U.S. Canada World Catholic
“To ignore [the final document] would be a lack of obedience to the Holy Father’s legitimate authority, while to find one or other point difficult could not be considered a lack of faith,” Czerny said.

The Czechoslovakian-born Canadian Jesuit, whom Pope Francis made a cardinal in 2019, added that the final document, “consisting of proposals made and voted by the Synod Fathers, has the weight of a synodal final document.” Querida Amazonia, “reflecting on the whole process and its final document, has the authority of ordinary magisterium of the Successor of Peter.”

The cardinal’s comments left members of the Vatican press corps perplexed.

Veteran Italian journalist Sandro Magister summed up the problem, saying: “In the exhortation there’s not a word regarding the priestly ordination of married men. But in the synod’s final document there is […] Does this mean a bishops’ conference can take the final document as a springboard to decide on matters concerning the priestly ordination of married men?”

Cardinal Czerny said he didn’t recall saying the final document is included in the papal magisterium but that the various and particular proposals “remain on the table” and that the Pope “encourages the Church in the Amazon and the Church everywhere” to “apply [them] in proportion to the reality in which they find themselves.”

Seeking to clear up the confusion, Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni said: “The apostolic exhortation [Querida Amazonia] is magisterium. The final document is not magisterium.”

Bruni said the Amazon synod’s treatment of celibacy and the permanent diaconate “was meant to respond to the pastoral need: evangelization” and that “the Pope’s position on celibacy” has been reported in the media.

Still not satisfied, another journalist asked how one is to understand the final document in light of Pope Francis’s 2018 apostolic constitution Episcopalis Communio, n. 18, which states: “If it is expressly approved by the Roman Pontiff, the final document participates in the ordinary Magisterium of the Successor of Peter.”

Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, Secretary General of the Synod of Bishops, clarified that Querida Amazonia “does not talk about approval of the final document” but about “presentation” and is therefore “not magisterial.”

New York Times reporter Jason Horowitz pressed further, asking if the “issue of married priests” can be implemented by bishops’ conferences “without the Pope’s approval.” Bishops conferences “can’t just decide to do that,” he said, suggesting that Querida Amazonia therefore seems like a “rejection” of married priests.

Matteo Bruni reiterated that “the synod was on evangelization” and that, while “proposals were made, not all of them were picked up in the apostolic exhortation.”

The final document is “precious” and derives its authority “from the synod of bishops,” he said, but it “does not become magisterium” through the Pope’s presentation of it in Querida Amazonia.

The Vatican spokesman insisted that “anything in the final document should be read through the lens of the apostolic exhortation.”

“Even the application or implementation should be done in light of the exhortation itself … Is it clear?” he asked.

Apparently not to all, as NBC then pressed Cardinals Baldisseri and Czerny for “a little clarity.”

“Does this mean that the Pope has closed the door on the issue of married priests and women deacons?” NBC’s correspondent asked.

Cardinal Czerny implied that clarity was not the object of the exercise, explaining:

I think the best way to understand this is as part of a process and part of a journey. That’s why it’s called the synod. We are at a very important point of the synodal process, and there are long roads ahead as well as roads already travelled. And so, the questions you are returning to are questions on the road, and the Holy Father has not resolved them in any way beyond what he has said in the exhortation. So, if there are questions you feel are open, or that the Church feels are open, thanks to the exhortation, they will continue to be debated, discussed, discerned, prayed over and when mature, presented to the appropriate authority for decision. There are decisions that can be made in a diocese, in a [bishops’] conference. And there are decisions that are made here [in Rome]. So, I think if you’re looking for a kind of closure so that you can end your article with a punch, I’m afraid there isn’t that kind of closure.

After the press conference, LifeSite spoke with Sr. Bernadette Riess, English coordinator for Vatican News, about the magisterial weight of the synod’s final document.

“The final document does not have ordinary magisterial authority unless it is ratified and promulgated by Pope Francis and that’s a direct quote from number 18 of Episcopalis Communio. This particular final document did not receive such ratification and promulgation. We need to be very clear about that,” she said.

Sr. Bernadette continued: “What we also have to remember is that all synod’s have a final document. In this case, the synod’s final document was published and in this particular apostolic exhortation the Holy Father is presenting it and wants it to be read, but he also wants people to strive to implement it.”

Pressed on what she meant by implementing the final document, Sr. Bernadette mentioned a number of non-controversial measures proposed in the document and observed that not all of them were directly referenced in the Pope’s apostolic exhortation, suggesting that Pope Francis “wants this document to remain alive.”

When it was suggested to Sr. Bernadette that there is a significant difference between the creation of a university or a communication network and the ordination of sexually active married men, she conceded that such a decision would have to be approved by the Pope.

“I think Pope Francis has been very clear, even in this document, that in his mind more ordained ministries are not what the Church needs. He’s made that very clear and he’s consistent in saying that, because he sees that one element that needs to be corrected first is the link between authority and priesthood (while maintaining a hierarchical Church). He comes out directly saying that,” she said.

While stressing Pope Francis’ observation that women represent the Marian aspect of the Church, and that the fixation on female ordination may express clericalist presuppositions, Sr. Bernadette was unwilling to concede that a woman is simply not the proper matter for the Sacrament of orders (just as orange juice cannot be used for baptism). She was of the view that the issue of women being ordained to the diaconate was still up for discussion.

Pope Francis has decided not to make a universal law allowing for the priestly ordination of married men in Querida Amazonia, but given his emphasis on the synod’s final document, will he allow local synods to decide in the future? The “journey” continues.

En bref, ce que le Souverain Pontife dit du document final dans Querida Amazonia ne constitue pas une approbation telle que prévue au n°18 de Ecclesialis Communio, d'après divers intervenants du côté du Vatican.
Mais quelle est leur autorité pour le dire ?
Et de toutes façons, ces mêmes intervenants insistent pour dire que rien n'est décidé au sujet des changement dans le sacrement de l'ordre, et que tout reste possible, et que le document final reste à considérer...
Il y a bien "confusion au sommet" : le Souverain Pontife a dit de mettre la pagaille, et il n'est pas de ceux qui disent et ne font pas.


  Envoyer ce message à un ami

 QUERIDA AMAZONIA - texte intégral par Jean Kinzler  (2020-02-12 11:38:04)
      Querida Amazonia, le texte sur le site du Vatican par Jean Kinzler  (2020-02-12 12:08:41)
          En français ... par Rémi  (2020-02-12 12:11:00)
              Ca rapelle l'édito mentionné par JVJ par Meneau  (2020-02-12 12:53:09)
                  Sacerdoce par Rémi  (2020-02-12 12:59:49)
                  Hihi par Meneau  (2020-02-12 13:01:50)
                      Et pour ceux qui comprennent l'allemand par Meneau  (2020-02-12 13:09:19)
                          Et mea culpa par Meneau  (2020-02-12 13:28:21)
                      Très révélateur : par Rémi  (2020-02-12 13:12:26)
                      Non, pas tout à fait un peu partout, “große déception” par pacem tuam da nobis, Domine  (2020-02-12 18:22:41)
                          Vous avez raison par Meneau  (2020-02-12 19:55:51)
              Très étrange... par Justin Petipeu  (2020-02-12 12:58:33)
                  Concrètement par Rémi  (2020-02-12 13:08:40)
              Deo gratias ! - je n'y croyais pas ! par Paterculus  (2020-02-12 13:25:37)
                  J'y croyais quand même par Athanase  (2020-02-12 15:15:09)
                  Il faut rester vigilant par Regnum Galliae  (2020-02-12 15:20:38)
                      Certes... par Meneau  (2020-02-12 15:51:15)
                          A ce compte-là, il y a une autre porte que le Pape n'a pas fermée par Regnum Galliae  (2020-02-13 11:11:53)
                  un demi soulagement en effet : les détails ont une affinité par Luc Perrin  (2020-02-12 17:20:59)
                      "I had a dream" (sur l' Amazonie) par AVV-VVK  (2020-02-12 17:42:15)
                  Quand on dit.... par FilsDeMarie  (2020-02-13 08:13:36)
                  Ne sommes-nous pas trop optimistes? par AVV-VVK  (2020-02-13 09:06:55)
                      ceci est un discours classique là n'est pas la source d'inquiétude par Luc Perrin  (2020-02-13 09:46:55)
                          Le paragraphe sur l'idolâtrie... par Paterculus  (2020-02-13 11:51:57)
      en conclusion : les féministes et les LGBT par jejomau  (2020-02-12 13:48:01)
          Peut-être… par Le Cap  (2020-02-12 13:54:14)
              C'est en tout cas l'avis de Sandro Magister par Meneau  (2020-02-12 14:57:16)
      La première Exhortation apostolique par AVV-VVK  (2020-02-12 14:45:18)
          Cdl Müller:«Querida Amazonia»,document de réconciliation par Jean Kinzler  (2020-02-12 15:28:48)
      Comment les progressistes ont-ils reçu QA? par Jean Kinzler  (2020-02-12 16:01:20)
      "Le silence de François, les larmes de Ratzinger et sa déclaration jamais [...] par Cristo  (2020-02-12 18:55:21)
          Benoît XVI n'a rien apporté à l'Eglise! par Miserere  (2020-02-12 22:42:24)
              Misère de misère… par pacem tuam da nobis, Domine  (2020-02-12 23:00:47)
              Soyez juste par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 07:27:54)
              Comment peut-on en tant que catholique dire des choses pareilles? par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 09:12:38)
                  Summorum Pontiificum est du 7 juillet ... 2007 par Luc Perrin  (2020-02-13 09:48:54)
                      Merci pour cette précision! par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 11:31:20)
                          Ah bon? par Miserere  (2020-02-13 12:36:42)
                          Vous tapez complètement à côté par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 12:53:53)
                              du calme! par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 15:46:05)
                                  Non. Vous êtes à côté de la plaque par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 16:00:06)
                                      Ont !!! par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 16:03:14)
                                      Laissez-moi par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 16:09:56)
                                          D'accord... par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 16:42:28)
                                              Quel bêtise... par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 18:08:37)
                                                  A quel moment... par Pétrarque  (2020-02-13 22:34:07)
                                                      honnêtement par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 23:07:44)
                                                          Votre erreur par Meneau  (2020-02-13 23:57:09)
                                                              C'est vrai par Eudoxie  (2020-02-14 11:26:38)
                                                      Et j'ai déjà précisé par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 23:17:30)
                                                      Mais par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 23:22:49)
                                                          Allez par Pétrarque  (2020-02-14 07:48:54)
                                                              Certes par Eudoxie  (2020-02-14 11:29:11)
                                          Et bé! par Miserere  (2020-02-13 17:09:08)
                                              heureusement par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 18:28:18)
                          Vous faites erreur par Turlure  (2020-02-13 13:42:33)
                              Hum... par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 19:44:18)
                                  Ah. par Turlure  (2020-02-13 19:57:26)
                                      Non mais par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 21:05:47)
                                          Il faut rester factuel. par Regnum Galliae  (2020-02-14 10:29:12)
                                              [réponse] par Eudoxie  (2020-02-14 19:26:13)
              Gloria Olivae par ami de la Miséricorde  (2020-02-13 09:29:48)
              traduction : vous n'avez rien vu de ce que ... par Glycéra  (2020-02-13 09:58:29)
              Vous oubliez seulement par Vulpus  (2020-02-13 15:08:48)
      Pour les néo-cathos,ce n'est qu'un début, continuons le combat ! par Jean Kinzler  (2020-02-12 19:20:55)
      Je suis tout de même très dubitative par Jeanne Smits  (2020-02-13 11:20:14)
          Le temps est tout de même à l'action de grâce! par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 11:35:30)
          J'ai lu votre excellent commentaire par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 11:44:20)
              Célibat sacerdotal ? par Jeanne Smits  (2020-02-13 12:11:44)
                  Vous avez raison par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 15:53:58)
                      Pour Eudoxie par Jeanne Smits  (2020-02-13 16:55:45)
                          c'est fait par Eudoxie  (2020-02-13 19:40:37)
              Volte-face ? par Rémi  (2020-02-13 12:13:28)
          Aucune volte-face, mais une porte ouverte par Jeanne Smits  (2020-02-13 12:30:17)
          Vous avez malheureusement raison par Paterculus  (2020-02-13 16:25:49)
              Confusion au sommet par Paterculus  (2020-02-14 08:12:16)
                  la réponse alambiquée du cardinal Czerny est en fait claire : tout reste ouver [...] par Luc Perrin  (2020-02-14 10:45:58)
      Normal ? Prophétique ? par AVV-VVK  (2020-02-14 09:35:22)

52 liseurs actuellement sur le forum
[Valid RSS]